- Insolvency Insider Canada
- Posts
- Cross-Border Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
Cross-Border Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
![](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=80/uploads/asset/file/2b58efeb-840c-4be4-a5c3-fccfc15952db/towfiqu-barbhuiya-hn2hQoALBCk-unsplash.jpg?t=1721406328)
Aryo Shalviri, Caitlin McIntyre and Jake Harris of Blakes explain why the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, which restricts non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 plans, contrasts with Canadian courts' more flexible approach.